Showing posts with label Nikon D3100. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nikon D3100. Show all posts

07 May, 2012

Nikon D3200 with D800 image processor for $699, Peter Jackson answers The Hobbit criticism / Zeiss anamorphic for September

Peter Jackson answers The Hobbit criticism / Zeiss anamorphic for September / Nikon D3200 with D800 image processor for $699
Sunday, 29 April, 2012 on EOShd
Peter Jackson on set of The Hobbit

Peter Jackson is unfazed by criticism The Hobbit looks un-cinematic by saying the clips shown at Cinemacon were unfinished and their duration not long enough for the audience to acclimatise.

Speaking about the 10 minutes of EPIC shot footage in 3D at 48fps which is the source of the criticism, Jackson remarks:

“It does take you a while to get used to. Ten minutes is sort of marginal, it probably needed a little bit more. Another thing that I think is a factor is it’s different to look at a bunch of clips and some were fast-cutting, montage-style clips. This is different experience than watching a character and story unfold… I personally wouldn’t advocate a 48-frame trailer because the 48 frames is something you should experience with the entire film. A 2 1/2 minute trailer isn’t enough time to adjust to the immersive quality.”

According to the Hollywood Reporter article, Jackon watches dailies at 48fps every day, sometimes up to 2 hours worth.

“You get used to it reasonably quickly,”

Jackson says that having aclamisted to the new frame rate he feels the shortcomings of 24fps more and more.

“I’m very aware of the strobing, the flicker and the artefacts.”

Presumably the artefacts he mentions are related to 3D 24p. He goes onto explain that the footage at Cinemacon had not gone through the final post production process and that the final film would look a little less like I Claudius HD.

“We have obviously seen cuts of our movie at 48 and in a relatively short amount of time you have forgotten (the frame rate change). It is a more immersive and in 3D a gentler way to see the film. We are certainly going to experiment with different finishing techniques to give the 48 frames a look that is more organic. But that work isn’t due to start until we wrap photography in July”

The footage is being shot in 5K on the EPIC, and lacks the traditional motion blur associated with film’s 180 degrees shutter at 24p.

Simplistic and dream-like or glossy and crisp? I suppose it a sense I like my art to be primal, raw and primitive and the constant march of technology and my urges for better images run counter to that. Maybe it is time to take stock and look at the old cover of The Hobbit below (though not the original 1937 first edition version – that was even more primitive!) to realise what we’re missing in many modern motion pictures.

A very similar thing has happened in the evolution of video games – in the way the touch of the human hand during the retro days of hand draw sprites has been swept away by more and more photo realism, 3D and high frame rates. There will always be room for the artistry of a human hand however primitive and much as I love technology, 2D cinema is going nowhere in my opinion. And this isn’t some nostalgia thing!
The-Hobbit (original cover)

Via the BBC
Source Hollywood Reporter

Prototype Zeiss anamorphic coming at IBC in September 2012

From a Zeiss product manager:

We only showed a Concept Anamorphic at the NAB Show. [This] Concept anamorphic is the result of a technical study which shows advanced and outstanding 
technology which is already well improved and will be further developed and focused by our
 product management. We decided to name it a concept following the example of the automotive industry.
 We will show a first prototype on IBC 2012 in September and release all the technical details as well.

Thanks Stéphane

Nikon D3200

The Nikon D3200 could be interesting for DSLR video shooters not ponying up to recent pricey models such as the Nikon D800 and 5D Mark III.

I’m curious about this camera because it partners a ‘Nikon developed’ version of Sony’s NEX 7 sensor with the very capable EXPEED 3 processor – the same found in the D800 (and $6k flagship D4) which does a rather good job of video (at least in the D800!). How will it compare to the already very capable NEX 7?

The camera also has a few ‘bonus’ features that you wouldn’t expect for the price – like on screen audio meters and full manual control of video, PAL / NTSC worldcam switchable 24p and 25p, 60p in 720p and a 921k LCD. ISO goes all the way to 12,800 in video mode.

HDMI is fit for monitoring but isn’t clean of icons so no external recording to the Atomos Ninja on this one (unless the final firmware is adjusted to support this).

It is unlikely to offer a better image in video mode than the GH2 but it is worth keeping an eye out for proper sample footage (not heavily compressed YouTube stuff) ahead of its release in May.





Source: EOSHD.com

Earn Money.....Short You URLs....

http://adfoc.us/

20 April, 2012

15 April, 2012

Nikon D800 vs D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan

Nikon D800 vs D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
By CARYTHELABELGUY [NR] | Published: APRIL 10, 2012

D800 D3s D7k MainImageSmall2 Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 by Cary Jordan (Web | Flickr | Personal FB page |The Jordan Collective’s FB Page | Twitter)
There is no question the Nikon D800/E is a spectacular camera. But just how well does the D800 stack-up against the venerable Nikon D3s? What about in DX crop mode; how well does it fare against the D7000? We now know the new Nikon D800 has a bad case of multiple personality disorder. The D800 is several different cameras, rolled-up into one very sleek and attractive body.
Let's examine just how well the D800 performs when down-sampled to 12.1 megapixels to match the un-defeated high-ISO king, the Nikon D3s. In addition to this comparison, we're also going to put the Nikon D800 against the current APS-C DX crop champion, the Nikon D7000.

Nikon D800 vs. Nikon D3s

The D800/E is capable of achieving amazing amounts of detail at its native resolution of 36.3 million pixels. This is great for studio and landscape work or anything that warrants this kind of resolution. However, the final output doesn't always need to be the native resolution of 36.3 MP. What we've found is the D800 has excellent Dynamic Range combined with excellent high-ISO noise characteristics, giving us the ability to down-sample when need-be, while retaining all of the high-frequency detail captured by the high-resolution sensor. We know that down-sampling an image helps to reduce noise (especially luminance noise), so we reap the benefits of lower noise andbetter detail, while retaining the D800's excellent Dynamic Range (DR) when down-sampling. A down-sampled image that has more high-frequency detail is a better candidate for noise-reduction via software (Lightroom 4, Topaz DeNoise...etc) and can handle more aggressive noise reduction, while still retaining high-frequency detail that's usually lost during aggressive noise-reduction.
For this comparison, we shot both cameras at the same respective exposure, ISO, aperture and white balance and set both cameras to the "STANDARD" Picture Control with no additional capture sharpening, contrast, brightness, saturation or hue. Both cameras were shot in RAW(NEF) format and developed into a high-quality 8 bit JPEG format using Capture NX2 with zero High-ISO Noise Reduction.  The D800 shots were then opened in Photoshop and down-sampled using Photoshop's "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm to 4256 x 2840 px to match the D3s' native resolution. No other sharpening was performed (click on any image to enlarge it).
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO1600 Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO1600 Crop 1
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO3200 Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO3200 Crop 1
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO6400 Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO6400 Crop 1
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO12800 Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO12800 Crop 1
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO25600 Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO25600 Crop 1
As you can clearly discern, the D800 image retains much more high-frequency detail throughout the ISO range. The D3s does beat the D800 in luminance noise by about a third-stop, with chrominance noise being significantly worse in the D800's files above ISO-12800. As stated above, the D800's file can handle much more aggressive noise reduction, while retaining much of its detail, which will result in a better overall file than the D3s until about ISO-25,600. At this point, the D800's files are riddled with amp noise which is destroying most of the high-frequency detail advantage it had over the D3s, making the D3s a better option from ISO-25,600 and up (The only way the D800 can go above ISO-25600 is by "pushing" in post).
While the D800's DR is supremely impressive at base ISO (ISO-100) to about ISO-800 (about 14.3EV @ ISO-100), it falls off at higher ISOs. This is where the D3s shines; the D3s has less DR fall-off at upper ISOs, but several stops less DR at base ISO as compared to the D800.
While the D800 doesn't quite beat the D3s in high-ISO noise handling when down-sampled to 12.1 MP (without noise reduction), the D800 will clearly out-perform the D3/D700 sensor in noise, sharpness, detail and DR, at every ISO, when down-sampled to the same resolution of 12.1 MP.
Let's look at a different set of D800 vs. D3s crops, this time focusing on the high-frequency detail in the books on the bottom shelf.
D3s D800 ISO1600 small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO1600 Crop 2
D3s D800 ISO3200 small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO3200 Crop 2
D3s D800 ISO6400 small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO6400 Crop 2
D3s D800 ISO12800 small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO12800 Crop 2
D3s D800 ISO25600 small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D3s vs D800 12mp ISO25600 Crop 2
Once again, you can clearly see the high-frequency detail advantage the D800 has over the D3s, when down-sampled to 12.1 million pixels. Look at the dark brown book on the left side of each crop; the D800 clearly renders the detailed fabric cross-hatching @ ISO-12800 and can just barely be seen @ ISO-25600. The D800 files are sharper and retain more high-frequency details at every ISO.

Nikon D800 vs. Nikon D7000

While the D800/E is 36.3 MP in FX mode, the D800/E has a DX (1.5x crop) mode, which is 15.4 MP. The Nikon D7000 is a 16.2 MP APS-C DX format camera that currently sits atop the APS-C camera heap, having the best performing APS-C sensor in the world, based on the Sony Exmor 16.2 MP sensor (this 16.2 Sony Exmor sensor is used in several other cameras on the market). Since the D800 has a DX crop mode that's roughly the same resolution as the D7000's sensor, we wanted to see how the D800 performed in comparison to the D7000. Please keep in-mind, the D7000 does have a slightly higher resolution, although not by much.
The D800 has a pixel pitch of 4.88µm, while the D7000 has a pixel pitch of 4.78µm, the .10µm is almost insignificant, which means the pixel pitch is roughly the same in both cameras, with the D800 having a slightly larger pixel pitch. This also helps us come to the conclusion that the D800/E sensor is based on a Sony Exmor design, although this is still yet to be confirmed, but is widely rumored to be true.
As with the D800 vs. D3s comparison, we shot both cameras at the same respective exposure, ISO, aperture and white balance and set both cameras to the "STANDARD" Picture Control with no additional capture sharpening, contrast, brightness, saturation or hue. Both cameras were shot in RAW(NEF) format and developed into a high-quality 8 bit JPEG format using Capture NX2 with zero High-ISO Noise Reduction. No other sharpening or post-production was performed.
Let's examine the D800 vs. D7000 image comparisons (click on any image to enlarge it):
D800 vs D7K ISO1600 Crop2Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D800 vs D7K ISO1600 Crop
D800 vs D7K ISO3200 Crop2Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D800 vs D7K ISO3200 Crop
D800 vs D7K ISO6400 Crop2Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D800 vs D7K ISO6400 Crop
D800 vs D7K ISO12800 Crop2Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D800 vs D7K ISO12800 Crop
D800 vs D7K ISO25600 Crop2Small Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
D800 vs D7K ISO25600 Crop
As you can see, the D800 does out-perform the D7000 at every ISO, although in luminance noise, they are closer at lower ISOs. Where the D800 shines is sharpness, micro-contrast and chrominance noise. Even with the D7000 having slightly better resolution, the D800 has much better effective resolution, which shows as a sharper image and better high-frequency detail. Not only does the D800 out-perform the D7000 in detail, micro-contrast and luminance noise, the D800 has significantly less chrominance noise. This is exaggerated as the ISO rises. An example of this can be seen below.
The D800's sharper image and more high-frequency detail might point to a weaker OLPF (Optical Low-Pass Filter a.k.a. AA-Filter) on the D800. The D800E would reveal even more sharpness, micro-contrast and high-frequency detail as compared to the D7000, due to its Anti-Aliasing characteristics being canceled-out in the D800E's OLPF filter stack.
Example of D800 vs. D7000 chrominance noise at ISO-25600:
D7000 D800 ISO25600 3 Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison by Cary Jordan
Nikon D800 vs. D7000 ISO-25600
I've made the full-resolution images available at the bottom of this article, I highly suggest the images to be downloaded and compared full-size, for full-effect. Looking especially at the more finely detailed writing on the book ends.

Conclusion

The D800 is an extremely versatile camera that can provide amazing 36.3 MP files in full-frame FX mode, whilst containing the ability to moon-light as the best APS-C DX format camera on the market. The D800/E has several other crop modes as well as the DX crop mode discussed here, which helps to make the D800/E one of the most versatile cameras on the market today.
A full review of the D800/D800E and D4 is coming soon as well as comparisons between the D800, D800E, D4 and D3s.
The D800 used in this particular test was sourced from Robert's Camera.
Full size Nikon D800 vs. D3s images:
Full size Nikon D800 vs. D7000 images:



Read more: NikonRumors.com

Nikon Singapore sent invitations for a “special announcement” on April 19th, Nikon D3200, Nikon SB-900, Nikon, special event,

Nikon Singapore sent invitations for a “special announcement” on April 19th
By [NR] ADMIN | Published: APRIL 12, 2012

Nikon Singapore press event D3200 April 19 Nikon Singapore sent invitations for a special announcement on April 19th
The event details are now removed from the website
Nikon Singapore posted this on their Facebook page yesterday with the headline "I am a memory maker":
Nikon Singapore Pte Ltd
Dear NikonClubbers,
A special announcement will be made and you will get to hear it first! Register with us!
NikonClub Event Details :: Press Conference
Nikonclub.com
‎10 lucky registrants will get to join us at Nikon Press Conference held on 19th April 2012, Thursday.
The Facebook post and the Nikonclub event page are now removed. This was the confirmation email sent upon registering for the event:
Dear ***,
You have registered for the following event, “I AM A MEMORY MAKER” successfully via the Nikon Professional Services site. Please print out this email and bring it along with you to attend the event.
Event Name:“I AM A MEMORY MAKER”
Reference Number:19April2012_PC
Event Theme:Press Conference
Organizer:Nikon xxx Pte Ltd
Event Date:19 Apr 2012
Event Time:12PM to 3PM
Location/Venue:To be disclosed
If you have any further queries, please contact us at ***.
Yours sincerely,
NPS ***
This event is for the new Nikon D3200 DSLR camera that is expected to be announced on April 19th, 2012.
This entry was posted in Nikon D3200 and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.


Read more: NikonRumors.com

Ayeza Khan Photoshoot 2020, Ayeza Khan Photos, Ayeza Khan 2020 New

Ayeza Khan Hot Photoshoot Ayeza Khan Hot Photoshoot, Ayeza Khan, Ayeza Khan Photos